Central to these discussions were conversations about IT infrastructure and what needed to be re-architected, goals of the company and its stakeholders, and of course, regulatory issues and the overall regulatory climate.Īll of these are meaty issues in themselves. The meetings that I was asked to attend concerned strategic planning for a smart energy grid. Some companies have tried to do something about it by instituting the idea of “the 30-minute meeting.” I saw this in action a couple of years ago, when I was consulting with a major West Coast utilities company. This meeting discontent has been known by organizations for years. That’s a lot for something many employees consider unproductive. Russell also concluded that the average meeting costs an organization $338 in paid staff salary time. Other complaints were that meetings were disorganized or dominated by individuals. The most common complaint about meetings was that they don’t result in any decisions getting made. After examining studies done on the topic, Russell found that, by far, staff meetings were the most common meeting type, followed by task force meetings, and information sharing meetings. In 2016, Daniel Russell, a former marketing consultant who created Attentiv, a time and meeting management platform, blogged about the toll that meetings took on organizations. Here's how to get more out of meetings in less time. Long meetings, and too many meetings, can be a source of employee dissatisfaction. The 30-minute meeting: Why shorter meetings can be more productive
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |